Grok 4.7 (Low) vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Low) scores 20.4 points higher (42.2 vs 21.8) but costs 26× as much to run the benchmark ($1631 vs $61.9; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (Low) when you need intelligence above 21.8, and MiMo-V2.5 when 21.8 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (Low) | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.2 | 21.8 | −48.3% MiMo-V2.5 is 48.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,630.69 | $61.93 | −96.2% MiMo-V2.5 is 96.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.64s | 46.61s | +241.7% MiMo-V2.5 is 241.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.5 vs Grok 4.7 (Low): 48.3% less intelligence, 96.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 241.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
Grok 4.7 (Low)MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill