Grok 4.7 (Low) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Grok 4.7 (Low): 1.2% more intelligence, 82.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 124.6% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (Low) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.2 | 42.7 | +1.2% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 1.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,630.69 | $283.18 | −82.6% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 82.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.28s | 25.34s | +124.6% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 124.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Grok 4.7 (Low)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill