Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 10.2 points higher (52.4 vs 42.2) but costs 3.5× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $1631; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 42.2, and Grok 4.7 (Low) when 42.2 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.2 | 52.4 | +24.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 24.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,630.69 | $5,786.78 | +254.9% Muse Wonder (Max) is 3.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.28s | 41.43s | +267.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 267.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Grok 4.7 (Low): 24.2% more intelligence, 254.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 267.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Grok 4.7 (Low)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill