Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Low) scores 29.5 points higher (42.2 vs 12.7) but costs 6.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1407 vs $234; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (Low) when you need intelligence above 12.7, and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) when 12.7 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.2 | 12.7 | −69.9% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 69.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,406.89 | $233.56 | −83.4% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 83.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.13s | 22.73s | +87.4% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 87.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.23 / $2.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Grok 4.7 (Low): 69.9% less intelligence, 83.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Grok 4.7 (Low)Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill