Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Low) scores 11.9 points higher (42.2 vs 30.3) but costs 5.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1631 vs $319; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (Low) when you need intelligence above 30.3, and Beam 1.0 when 30.3 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.2 | 30.3 | −28.2% Beam 1.0 is 28.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,630.69 | $318.73 | −80.5% Beam 1.0 is 80.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.28s | 8.02s | −28.9% Beam 1.0 is 28.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs Grok 4.7 (Low): 28.2% less intelligence, 80.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 28.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Grok 4.7 (Low)Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill