Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Ring-2.6-1T
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI or Ring-2.6-1T by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Low) scores 25.6 points higher (42.2 vs 16.6) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1631 vs $576; both premium class). Pick Grok 4.7 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Ring-2.6-1T.
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Ring-2.6-1T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.2 | 16.6 | −60.7% Ring-2.6-1T is 60.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,630.69 | $575.60 | −64.7% Ring-2.6-1T is 64.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.26s | 24.04s | +113.5% Ring-2.6-1T is 113.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.30 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Ring-2.6-1T vs Grok 4.7 (Low): 60.7% less intelligence, 64.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 113.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Ring-2.6-1T is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Grok 4.7 (Low)Ring-2.6-1TToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/ring-2-6-1t · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7-low/ring-2-6-1t?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill