Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI or Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) scores 1.4 points higher (35.5 vs 34.1) but costs 62× as much to run the benchmark ($5906 vs $95.7; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 34.1, and Muse Ember (Xhigh) when 34.1 is enough.
| Metric | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.5 | 34.1 | −3.9% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 3.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,905.50 | $95.73 | −98.4% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 98.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 87.92s | 9.48s | −89.2% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 89.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $6.00 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs Grok 4.7 (Xhigh): 3.9% less intelligence, 98.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 89.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) scores 58.30 for $5903.
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)Muse Ember (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7/muse-ember-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/grok-4-7/muse-ember-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill