Hy3 vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Hy3 by Tencent or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Hy3 scores 7.8 points higher (25.3 vs 17.5) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($150 vs $146; both mid-range class). Pick Hy3 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Glimmer (High).
| Metric | Hy3 | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.3 | 17.5 | −30.8% Muse Glimmer (High) is 30.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.61 | $145.77 | −2.6% Muse Glimmer (High) is 2.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.29s | 24.76s | −25.6% Muse Glimmer (High) is 25.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.56 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Hy3: 30.8% less intelligence, 2.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 25.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Hy3Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hy3/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hy3/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill