Hy3 vs Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Hy3 by Tencent or Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) scores 13.6 points higher (38.9 vs 25.3) but costs 7.9× as much to run the benchmark ($1185 vs $150; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 25.3, and Hy3 when 25.3 is enough.
| Metric | Hy3 | Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.3 | 38.9 | +53.8% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 53.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.61 | $1,184.90 | +692.0% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 7.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.29s | 17.34s | −47.9% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 47.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.56 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) vs Hy3: 53.8% more intelligence, 692.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 47.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Hy3Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hy3/muse-spark-open · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hy3/muse-spark-open?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill