Hy3 vs Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Hy3 by Tencent or Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) scores 2.3 points higher (27.6 vs 25.3) but costs 7.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1165 vs $150; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) when you need intelligence above 25.3, and Hy3 when 25.3 is enough.
| Metric | Hy3 | Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.3 | 27.6 | +9.1% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 9.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $149.61 | $1,165.00 | +678.7% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 7.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 33.73s | 56.04s | +66.1% Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is 66.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.56 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) vs Hy3: 9.1% more intelligence, 678.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 66.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Hy3Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hy3/qwen3-8-27b-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hy3/qwen3-8-27b-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill