Hy3 vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Hy3 by Tencent or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-19.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Hy3
Trinity Large Thinking vs Hy3: 55.7% less intelligence, 173.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 64.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Hy3 | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.2 | 18.7 | −55.7% Trinity Large Thinking is 55.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $93.20 | $254.72 | +173.3% Trinity Large Thinking is 2.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 40.10s | 14.08s | −64.9% Trinity Large Thinking is 64.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.55 | $0.23 / $0.88 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (high) scores 47.00 for $55.0.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
Hy3Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hy3/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hy3/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill