Hy3 vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Hy3 by Tencent or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-22.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Hy3
Trinity Large Thinking vs Hy3: 57.3% less intelligence, 233.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 69.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Hy3 | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.3 | 10.8 | −57.3% Trinity Large Thinking is 57.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $155.51 | $518.07 | +233.1% Trinity Large Thinking is 3.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 30.37s | 9.39s | −69.1% Trinity Large Thinking is 69.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.14 / $0.58 | $0.25 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (high) scores 32.10 for $108.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Hy3Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/hy3/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/hy3/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill