Inkling 2 Small vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: Inkling 2 Small by Thinking Machines or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-06.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Inkling 2 Small scores 3.9 points higher (30.6 vs 26.7) but costs 7.5× as much to run the benchmark ($792 vs $106; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Inkling 2 Small when you need intelligence above 26.7, and MiMo-V2.6-Flash when 26.7 is enough.
| Metric | Inkling 2 Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.6 | 26.7 | −12.7% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 12.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $791.81 | $106.14 | −86.6% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 86.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.92s | 76.17s | +264.1% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 264.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.00 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Inkling 2 Small: 12.7% less intelligence, 86.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 264.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Inkling 2 Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Inkling 2 SmallMiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/inkling-2-small/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/inkling-2-small/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill