Inkling 2 Small vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: Inkling 2 Small by Thinking Machines or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-06.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Inkling 2 Small scores 0.7 points higher (30.6 vs 29.9) but costs 3.6× as much to run the benchmark ($792 vs $221; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Inkling 2 Small when you need intelligence above 29.9, and MiMo-V2.6-Pro when 29.9 is enough.
| Metric | Inkling 2 Small | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.6 | 29.9 | −2.3% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 2.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $791.81 | $220.73 | −72.1% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 72.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.92s | 65.83s | +214.7% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 214.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.00 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Inkling 2 Small: 2.3% less intelligence, 72.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 214.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Inkling 2 Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 38.20 for $190.
Inkling 2 SmallMiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/inkling-2-small/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/inkling-2-small/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill