Inkling 2 Small vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Inkling 2 Small by Thinking Machines or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-06.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 13.0 points higher (43.6 vs 30.6) but costs 6.8× as much to run the benchmark ($5414 vs $792; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Wonder (Max) when you need intelligence above 30.6, and Inkling 2 Small when 30.6 is enough.
| Metric | Inkling 2 Small | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.6 | 43.6 | +42.5% Muse Wonder (Max) is 42.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $791.81 | $5,414.45 | +583.8% Muse Wonder (Max) is 6.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.92s | 51.01s | +143.8% Muse Wonder (Max) is 143.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.00 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Inkling 2 Small: 42.5% more intelligence, 583.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 143.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Inkling 2 Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.40 for $4766.
Inkling 2 SmallMuse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/inkling-2-small/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/inkling-2-small/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill