Inkling 2 Small vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Inkling 2 Small by Thinking Machines or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-06.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Inkling 2 Small scores 17.0 points higher (30.6 vs 13.6) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($792 vs $463; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Inkling 2 Small when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nemotron 3.5 Super VL.
| Metric | Inkling 2 Small | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.6 | 13.6 | −55.6% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 55.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $791.81 | $462.70 | −41.6% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 41.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.92s | 9.22s | −55.9% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 55.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.00 | $0.20 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Inkling 2 Small: 55.6% less intelligence, 41.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 55.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Inkling 2 Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 46.30 for $389.
Inkling 2 SmallNemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/inkling-2-small/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/inkling-2-small/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill