Inkling Small vs Mistral Large 3
Which is better for the money: Inkling Small by Thinking Machines or Mistral Large 3 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Inkling Small scores 16.4 points higher (25.7 vs 9.3) but costs 5.2× as much to run the benchmark ($241 vs $46.4; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Inkling Small when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Mistral Large 3 when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | Inkling Small | Mistral Large 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.7 | 9.3 | −63.8% Mistral Large 3 is 63.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $240.85 | $46.41 | −80.7% Mistral Large 3 is 80.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.67s | 7.18s | −43.3% Mistral Large 3 is 43.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.50 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 3 vs Inkling Small: 63.8% less intelligence, 80.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 43.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Inkling Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Mistral Large 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Inkling SmallMistral Large 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/inkling-small/mistral-large-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/inkling-small/mistral-large-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill