Inkling Small vs Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Inkling Small by Thinking Machines or Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Inkling Small
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) vs Inkling Small: 16.7% less intelligence, 375.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 760.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Inkling Small | Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.7 | 21.4 | −16.7% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 16.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $240.85 | $1,145.36 | +375.5% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 4.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.95s | 111.39s | +760.2% Qwen3.6 27B (Reasonin… is 760.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.60 / $3.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Inkling Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Inkling SmallQwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/inkling-small/qwen3-6-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/inkling-small/qwen3-6-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill