Inkling Small vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Inkling Small by Thinking Machines or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Inkling Small scores 14.9 points higher (25.7 vs 10.8) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($241 vs $233; both mid-range class). Pick Inkling Small when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Trinity Large Thinking.
| Metric | Inkling Small | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.7 | 10.8 | −58.0% Trinity Large Thinking is 58.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $240.85 | $232.95 | −3.3% Trinity Large Thinking is 3.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.67s | 8.30s | −34.5% Trinity Large Thinking is 34.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Inkling Small: 58.0% less intelligence, 3.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 34.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Inkling Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Inkling SmallTrinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/inkling-small/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/inkling-small/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill