Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) by Kimi or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) scores 1.2 points higher (27.0 vs 25.8) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1528 vs $993; both premium class). Pick Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.7 Code.
| Metric | Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 27.0 | 25.8 | −4.4% Kimi K2.7 Code is 4.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,528.20 | $992.88 | −35.0% Kimi K2.7 Code is 35.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 65.20s | 46.75s | −28.3% Kimi K2.7 Code is 28.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning): 4.4% less intelligence, 35.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 28.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-6/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-6/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill