Kimi K2.6 vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.6 by Kimi or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.6 scores 2.1 points higher (45.1 vs 43.0) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($841 vs $545; both premium class). Pick Kimi K2.6 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.7 Code.
| Metric | Kimi K2.6 | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 43.0 | −4.7% Kimi K2.7 Code is 4.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $841.11 | $544.58 | −35.3% Kimi K2.7 Code is 35.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 115.40s | 66.82s | −42.1% Kimi K2.7 Code is 42.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Kimi K2.6: 4.7% less intelligence, 35.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 42.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.6 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Muse Spark 1.2 (xhigh) scores 56.80 for $639.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
Kimi K2.6Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-6/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-6/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill