Kimi K2.7 Code vs Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 scores 18.1 points higher (43.9 vs 25.8) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($1552 vs $993; both premium class). Pick Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.7 Code.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.8 | 43.9 | +70.2% Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is 70.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $1,551.81 | +56.3% Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is 56.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.75s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 70.2% more intelligence, 56.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Kimi K2.7 CodeLing 3.1 Flash 1019Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/ling-3-1-flash-1019 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/ling-3-1-flash-1019?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill