Kimi K2.7 Code vs Llama 4 Scout
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Llama 4 Scout by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 19.3 points higher (25.8 vs 6.5) but costs 13× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $73.6; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout when 6.5 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 4 Scout | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.8 | 6.5 | −74.8% Llama 4 Scout is 74.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $73.56 | −92.6% Llama 4 Scout is 92.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.75s | 5.16s | −89.0% Llama 4 Scout is 89.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.18 / $0.66 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Scout vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 74.8% less intelligence, 92.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 89.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
Kimi K2.7 CodeLlama 4 ScoutToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/llama-4-scout · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/llama-4-scout?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill