Kimi K2.7 Code vs Llama 4 Scout
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Llama 4 Scout by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 32.7 points higher (43.0 vs 10.3) but costs 47× as much to run the benchmark ($545 vs $11.6; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 10.3, and Llama 4 Scout when 10.3 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Llama 4 Scout | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.0 | 10.3 | −76.0% Llama 4 Scout is 76.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $544.58 | $11.60 | −97.9% Llama 4 Scout is 97.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 66.82s | 5.45s | −91.8% Llama 4 Scout is 91.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.18 / $0.66 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Llama 4 Scout vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 76.0% less intelligence, 97.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 91.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) scores 26.80 for $10.2.
Kimi K2.7 CodeLlama 4 ScoutToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/llama-4-scout · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/llama-4-scout?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill