Kimi K2.7 Code vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 19.8 points higher (25.8 vs 6.0) but costs 26× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $37.6; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.8 | 6.0 | −76.7% Ministral 3 14B is 76.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $37.56 | −96.2% Ministral 3 14B is 96.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.75s | 6.97s | −85.1% Ministral 3 14B is 85.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 76.7% less intelligence, 96.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 85.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Kimi K2.7 CodeMinistral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill