Kimi K2.7 Code vs Mistral Small 3.1
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Mistral Small 3.1 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 18.7 points higher (25.8 vs 7.1) but costs 36× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $27.8; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 7.1, and Mistral Small 3.1 when 7.1 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Mistral Small 3.1 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.8 | 7.1 | −72.5% Mistral Small 3.1 is 72.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $27.82 | −97.2% Mistral Small 3.1 is 97.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.75s | 11.99s | −74.4% Mistral Small 3.1 is 74.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.08 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 3.1 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 72.5% less intelligence, 97.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 74.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Mistral Small 3.1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Kimi K2.7 CodeMistral Small 3.1Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/mistral-small-3-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/mistral-small-3-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill