Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 3.7 points higher (29.5 vs 25.8) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($2277 vs $993; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Qwen3.7 Max when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.7 Code.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.8 | 29.5 | +14.3% Qwen3.7 Max is 14.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $2,277.12 | +129.3% Qwen3.7 Max is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.75s | 16.61s | −64.5% Qwen3.7 Max is 64.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 14.3% more intelligence, 129.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 64.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Kimi K2.7 CodeQwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill