Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.7 Max scores 3.6 points higher (29.9 vs 26.3) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($2277 vs $993; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Qwen3.7 Max when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.7 Code.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.3 | 29.9 | +13.7% Qwen3.7 Max is 13.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $2,277.12 | +129.3% Qwen3.7 Max is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 41.22s | 16.87s | −59.1% Qwen3.7 Max is 59.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3.7 Max vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 13.7% more intelligence, 129.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 59.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Muse Spark 1.3 (max) scores 48.20 for $2000.
Kimi K2.7 CodeQwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill