Kimi K2.7 Code vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 18.0 points higher (25.8 vs 7.8) but costs 6.2× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $159; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 when 7.8 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.8 | 7.8 | −69.8% Solar Pro 3 is 69.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $992.88 | $159.22 | −84.0% Solar Pro 3 is 84.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.75s | 18.94s | −59.5% Solar Pro 3 is 59.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 69.8% less intelligence, 84.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 59.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Kimi K2.7 CodeSolar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill