Kimi K2.7 Code vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-19.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 28.5 points higher (43.0 vs 14.5) but costs 3.4× as much to run the benchmark ($545 vs $158; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 14.5, and Solar Pro 3 when 14.5 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K2.7 Code | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.0 | 14.5 | −66.3% Solar Pro 3 is 66.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $544.58 | $158.07 | −71.0% Solar Pro 3 is 71.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 75.91s | 18.88s | −75.1% Solar Pro 3 is 75.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.95 / $4.00 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Solar Pro 3 vs Kimi K2.7 Code: 66.3% less intelligence, 71.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 75.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) scores 56.00 for $485.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) scores 50.10 for $95.1.
Kimi K2.7 CodeSolar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k2-7-code/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill