Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 16.7 points higher (55.1 vs 38.4) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $1608; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Large 4 Preview.
| Metric | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 55.1 | 38.4 | −30.3% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 30.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,117.31 | $1,607.86 | −48.4% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 48.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 49.55s | 25.22s | −49.1% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 49.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $1.36 / $4.18 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: 30.3% less intelligence, 48.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 49.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Kimi K3.1 ProMistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill