Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Mistral Large 4 (Medium)
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi or Mistral Large 4 (Medium) by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-30.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 22.9 points higher (46.0 vs 23.1) but costs 3.4× as much to run the benchmark ($3153 vs $936; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 23.1, and Mistral Large 4 (Medium) when 23.1 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Mistral Large 4 (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.0 | 23.1 | −49.8% Mistral Large 4 (Medi… is 49.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,152.80 | $936.36 | −70.3% Mistral Large 4 (Medi… is 70.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 80.60s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.70 / $2.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 (Medium) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: 49.8% less intelligence, 70.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
- Mistral Large 4 (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.30 for $718.
Kimi K3.1 ProMistral Large 4 (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/mistral-large-4-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/mistral-large-4-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill