Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Muse Ember (Max)
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi or Muse Ember (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 10.5 points higher (46.5 vs 36.0) but costs 27× as much to run the benchmark ($3153 vs $117; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 36.0, and Muse Ember (Max) when 36.0 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Muse Ember (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 46.5 | 36.0 | −22.6% Muse Ember (Max) is 22.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,152.80 | $117.12 | −96.3% Muse Ember (Max) is 96.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 88.86s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Ember (Max) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: 22.6% less intelligence, 96.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
- Muse Ember (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Kimi K3.1 ProMuse Ember (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/muse-ember · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/muse-ember?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill