Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: 4.9% less intelligence, 85.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2.8% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 55.1 | 52.4 | −4.9% Muse Wonder (Max) is 4.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,117.31 | $5,786.78 | +85.6% Muse Wonder (Max) is 85.6% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 42.64s | 41.43s | −2.8% Muse Wonder (Max) is 2.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Kimi K3.1 ProMuse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill