Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 29.9 points higher (55.1 vs 25.2) but costs 7.3× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $428; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 25.2, and Qwen3.7 Plus when 25.2 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 55.1 | 25.2 | −54.3% Qwen3.7 Plus is 54.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,117.31 | $427.73 | −86.3% Qwen3.7 Plus is 86.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 46.58s | 47.00s | +0.9% Qwen3.7 Plus is 0.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: 54.3% less intelligence, 86.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 0.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Kimi K3.1 ProQwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill