Kimi K3 (Max) vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3 (Max) by Kimi or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3 (Max) scores 21.8 points higher (43.6 vs 21.8) but costs 59× as much to run the benchmark ($3658 vs $61.9; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 21.8, and MiMo-V2.5 when 21.8 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K3 (Max) | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.6 | 21.8 | −50.0% MiMo-V2.5 is 50.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,658.07 | $61.93 | −98.3% MiMo-V2.5 is 98.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 58.57s | 45.39s | −22.5% MiMo-V2.5 is 22.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.5 vs Kimi K3 (Max): 50.0% less intelligence, 98.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 22.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
Kimi K3 (Max)MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill