Kimi K3 (Max) vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3 (Max) by Kimi or Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3 (Max) scores 29.4 points higher (43.6 vs 14.2) but costs 2.9× as much to run the benchmark ($3658 vs $1264; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Kimi K3 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Mistral Medium 3.5.
| Metric | Kimi K3 (Max) | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.6 | 14.2 | −67.4% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 67.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,658.07 | $1,263.80 | −65.5% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 65.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 63.08s | 17.96s | −71.5% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 71.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $1.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Kimi K3 (Max): 67.4% less intelligence, 65.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 71.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Kimi K3 (Max)Mistral Medium 3.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3/mistral-medium-3-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3/mistral-medium-3-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill