Kimi K3 (Max) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3 (Max) by Kimi or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 8.8 points higher (52.4 vs 43.6) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $3658; both flagship class). Pick Muse Wonder (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K3 (Max).
| Metric | Kimi K3 (Max) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.6 | 52.4 | +20.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 20.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,658.07 | $5,786.78 | +58.2% Muse Wonder (Max) is 58.2% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 63.08s | 41.43s | −34.3% Muse Wonder (Max) is 34.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs Kimi K3 (Max): 20.2% more intelligence, 58.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 34.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Kimi K3 (Max)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill