Kimi K3 (Max) vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: Kimi K3 (Max) by Kimi or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3 (Max) scores 13.3 points higher (43.6 vs 30.3) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($3658 vs $319; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 30.3, and Beam 1.0 when 30.3 is enough.
| Metric | Kimi K3 (Max) | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.6 | 30.3 | −30.5% Beam 1.0 is 30.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,658.07 | $318.73 | −91.3% Beam 1.0 is 91.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 63.08s | 8.02s | −87.3% Beam 1.0 is 87.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $3.00 / $15.0 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs Kimi K3 (Max): 30.5% less intelligence, 91.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Kimi K3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Kimi K3 (Max)Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/kimi-k3/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill