Ling 3.0 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

InclusionAILing 3.0 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.10
Total cost
-
MetaLlama 4 ScoutOff the frontier
Intelligence
6.50
Total cost
$73.6
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricLing 3.0 FlashLlama 4 ScoutDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)20.16.5−67.7% Llama 4 Scout is 67.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$73.56— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.78s4.99s−57.6% Llama 4 Scout is 57.6% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.07 / $0.22$0.18 / $0.66
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerLing 3.0 Flash: what beats itLlama 4 Scout: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-0-flash/llama-4-scout · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-0-flash/llama-4-scout?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill