Ling 3.0 Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Ling 3.0 Flash by InclusionAI or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Ling 3.0 Flash scores 11.2 points higher (20.1 vs 8.9) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($89.8 vs $63.7; both mid-range class). Pick Ling 3.0 Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoni….
| Metric | Ling 3.0 Flash | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.1 | 8.9 | −55.7% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 55.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $89.77 | $63.74 | −29.0% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 29.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.85s | 10.29s | −19.9% NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nan… is 19.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.07 / $0.22 | $0.05 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs Ling 3.0 Flash: 55.7% less intelligence, 29.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 19.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ling 3.0 Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
Ling 3.0 FlashNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-0-flash/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-0-flash/nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill