Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 by InclusionAI or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 scores 37.9 points higher (43.9 vs 6.0) but costs 41× as much to run the benchmark ($1552 vs $37.6; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 6.0 | −86.3% Ministral 3 14B is 86.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,551.81 | $37.56 | −97.6% Ministral 3 14B is 97.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 8.05s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $0.90 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs Ling 3.1 Flash 1019: 86.3% less intelligence, 97.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019Ministral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill