Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2)
Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 | Quasar 438B (Max, Based on GLM-5.2) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 26.7 | −39.2% Quasar 438B (Max, Bas… is 39.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,551.81 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 16.87s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $0.90 | $0.11 / $0.33 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019/quasar-438b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash-1019/quasar-438b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill