Ling 3.1 Flash vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: Ling 3.1 Flash by InclusionAI or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Ling 3.1 Flash scores 35.1 points higher (41.1 vs 6.0) but costs 27× as much to run the benchmark ($1015 vs $37.6; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Ling 3.1 Flash when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | Ling 3.1 Flash | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.1 | 6.0 | −85.4% Ministral 3 14B is 85.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,014.56 | $37.56 | −96.3% Ministral 3 14B is 96.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.49s | 8.02s | −40.5% Ministral 3 14B is 40.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $0.90 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs Ling 3.1 Flash: 85.4% less intelligence, 96.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 40.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Ling 3.1 Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Ling 3.1 FlashMinistral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill