Ling 3.1 Flash vs Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct

Ling 3.1 Flash vs Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

InclusionAILing 3.1 FlashOff the frontier
Intelligence
41.10
Total cost
$1015
ByteDance SeedSeed-OSS-36B-InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
12.10
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricLing 3.1 FlashSeed-OSS-36B-InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)41.112.1−70.6% Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct is 70.6% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$1,014.56Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)13.64s67.17s+392.4% Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct is 392.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $0.90$0.21 / $0.57
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerLing 3.1 Flash: what beats itSeed-OSS-36B-Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash/seed-oss-36b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/ling-3-1-flash/seed-oss-36b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill