Llama 4 Maverick vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Maverick by Meta or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 28.6 points higher (37.9 vs 9.3) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($110 vs $44.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Llama 4 Maverick.
| Metric | Llama 4 Maverick | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.3 | 37.9 | +307.5% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 4.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $43.98 | $109.55 | +149.1% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.18s | 49.53s | +343.0% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 343.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $0.92 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick: 307.5% more intelligence, 149.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 343.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Llama 4 MaverickMiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-maverick/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-maverick/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill