Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Large 4 Preview
Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Maverick by Meta or Mistral Large 4 Preview by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Large 4 Preview scores 29.1 points higher (38.4 vs 9.3) but costs 37× as much to run the benchmark ($1608 vs $44.0; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Large 4 Preview when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | Llama 4 Maverick | Mistral Large 4 Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.3 | 38.4 | +312.9% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 4.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $43.98 | $1,607.86 | +3555.9% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 37× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.82s | 25.45s | +135.2% Mistral Large 4 Previ… is 135.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $0.92 | $1.36 / $4.18 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Llama 4 Maverick: 312.9% more intelligence, 3555.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 135.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Mistral Large 4 Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Llama 4 MaverickMistral Large 4 PreviewToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-maverick/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-maverick/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill