Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Maverick by Meta or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Llama 4 Maverick: 1.1% less intelligence, 821.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 40.6% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.3 | 9.2 | −1.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 1.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $43.98 | $405.10 | +821.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 9.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.45s | 6.21s | −40.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 40.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $0.92 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Llama 4 MaverickQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-maverick/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-maverick/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill