Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Maverick by Meta or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3 Coder Next scores 6.8 points higher (21.1 vs 14.3) but costs 6.5× as much to run the benchmark ($247 vs $38.2; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3 Coder Next when you need intelligence above 14.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 14.3 is enough.
| Metric | Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 14.3 | 21.1 | +47.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 47.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $38.21 | $247.26 | +547.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 6.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.84s | 6.61s | +13.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 13.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.35 / $0.85 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Llama 4 Maverick: 47.6% more intelligence, 547.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 13.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 scores 37.20 for $25.2.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
Llama 4 MaverickQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-maverick/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-maverick/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill