Llama 4 Scout vs Mistral Large 3
Which is better for the money: Llama 4 Scout by Meta or Mistral Large 3 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Mistral Large 3
Mistral Large 3 vs Llama 4 Scout: 43.1% more intelligence, 36.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 41.7% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Llama 4 Scout | Mistral Large 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.5 | 9.3 | +43.1% Mistral Large 3 is 43.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $73.56 | $46.41 | −36.9% Mistral Large 3 is 36.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.06s | 7.17s | +41.7% Mistral Large 3 is 41.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.18 / $0.66 | $0.50 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
- Mistral Large 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Llama 4 ScoutMistral Large 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/mistral-large-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/llama-4-scout/mistral-large-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill